"...i don’t think that’s a radical view to say we’re going to affirm marriage. i think the radical view is to say that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again."damn! just when i thought my airedale reggie was about to pop the question!
Thursday, January 17, 2008
please, please let this guy be the republican nominee for president! the fun never ends! yesterday he told msnbc that in college he used to cook squirrels in a popcorn popper! now there's this "clarification" of his views on that "marriage amendment" to the constitution (from an interview with beliefnet.com):
posted at 3:14 PM